Publish the call, collect abstracts against your own session tracks, review every submission with your committee, and turn the accepted ones into a published programme — all inside the same event.
| Presenter | Topic | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms Ananya VermaDemo Institute of Design | Measuring embodied carbon across mid-rise retrofits | Pending | |
| Dr Rohan IyerDemo Materials Lab | Bio-based insulation in humid climates | Accepted | |
| Ms Meera FernandesDemo City Authority | Procurement rules for low-carbon concrete | Accepted | |
| Mr Kabir ShahIndependent | Off-topic: solar tariff modelling | Rejected | |
| Prof Lila NandyDemo University | Cradle-to-gate data gaps in regional supply chains | Pending |
Everything the committee normally chases over email lives in one place, tied to the event and its sessions.
Title, subtitle, industry, venue, dates and organiser contact — your call for papers gets its own public page.
Public listingBreak the call into dated session tracks so every abstract arrives already sorted into the right part of the programme.
Date · TrackThe form closes itself the moment the submission deadline passes — no late entries to argue about afterwards.
Auto closeTopic, presenter, author, co-authors, affiliation, aim, contact details and the paper file — captured in one form.
PDF · DOC · DOCXYour committee works through the queue and marks each abstract accepted or rejected, with the decision time recorded.
Pending · Accepted · RejectedAccepted papers download through a permission-checked link, so drafts never leak from a guessable file path.
Gated fileAccepted abstracts roll straight into the day, hall and session where they were presented.
Day · Hall · SessionReceived, pending, accepted and rejected totals per track — so you know where the review is stuck.
Per trackThe organiser sets it up once; everything after that runs on the deadline and the review queue.
Add the title, industry, venue, dates, organiser contact and the submission deadline.
List the dated sessions authors can submit against, in the order they run.
They pick a track, fill in topic, authors, affiliation and aim, then upload the paper.
Once the date passes the form stops accepting, and the queue is frozen for review.
Reviewers accept or reject each abstract; the author is told and the count updates.
Accepted papers appear under their session, with a controlled download for delegates.
Set up the call, add your session tracks and share one link — abstracts start arriving sorted, and the committee reviews them in the same place.
Create Free AccountWhat would you like to tell us?
Complaint about some content? Grievance Officer
